{"id":575,"date":"2014-02-04T12:49:39","date_gmt":"2014-02-04T12:49:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/?p=575"},"modified":"2023-07-25T11:18:31","modified_gmt":"2023-07-25T15:18:31","slug":"5-know","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/trial\/5-know\/","title":{"rendered":"(5)   DID YOU KNOW?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The failure to foresee the need for a witness to authenticate a document until a motion in limine is filed by the adverse party on the day of trial does not excuse the proffering party from providing an adequate foundation for the evidence.\u00a0 <i>See<\/i> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.ri.gov\/COURTS\/SUPREMECOURT\/OPINIONS\/12-297.PDF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Martin v. Lawrence, No. 2012-297-Appeal<\/a> at 9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The failure to foresee the need for a witness to authenticate a document until a motion in limine is filed by the adverse party on the day of trial does not excuse the proffering party from providing an adequate foundation for the&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[75],"tags":[73,74,35],"class_list":["post-575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-trial","tag-authentication","tag-evidence","tag-rhode-island-superior-court-practice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/575\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}