{"id":661,"date":"2014-07-22T23:31:47","date_gmt":"2014-07-22T23:31:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/?p=661"},"modified":"2023-07-25T11:02:16","modified_gmt":"2023-07-25T15:02:16","slug":"5-know-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/trial\/5-know-3\/","title":{"rendered":"(5) DID YOU KNOW?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To prove that a trade practice is deceptive under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, R.I. Gen. Laws \u00a7 6-13.1-1 et seq., a plaintiff must demonstrate three elements \u201c[1] a representation, omission, or practice, that [2] is likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably under the circumstances, and [3], the representation, omission, or practice is material.\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.ri.gov\/Courts\/SupremeCourt\/Opinions\/12-248,%2012-249.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Long v. Dell, Inc<\/em>., No. 2012-248-Appeal at 21 <\/a>(adopting the FTC\u2019s interpretation of \u00a7 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To prove that a trade practice is deceptive under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, R.I. Gen. Laws \u00a7 6-13.1-1 et seq., a plaintiff must demonstrate three elements \u201c[1] a representation, omission, or practice, that [2] is likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[75],"tags":[85,14],"class_list":["post-661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-trial","tag-deceptive-trade-practices-act","tag-rhode-island-supreme-court"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/661\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.apslaw.com\/on-appeal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}