In a significant development for the Rhode Island cannabis market, on November 25, 2025, the United States First Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Jensen v. Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission,[1] which revived a constitutional challenge to Rhode Island’s cannabis retail licensing requirements. This opinion opens the door to further proceedings which could result in drastic changes to the Rhode Island retail cannabis application process and a possible delay in that process.
Enacted on May 25, 2022, the Rhode Island Cannabis Act[2] legalized adult-use marijuana, created the Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission, and authorized 24 retail licenses distributed across six geographic zones, with one “social equity” license per zone (six total). In pertinent part, the Act: (1) imposes a residency requirement for all applicants (individuals must be Rhode Island residents; entities must have a principal place of business in Rhode Island with at least 51% equity owned by Rhode Island residents), and (2) defines “social equity applicant” to include, among other criteria, majority ownership and control by individuals with an expungable cannabis offense or membership in an “impacted family,” and majority ownership and control by individuals who have resided for five of the prior ten years in a “disproportionately impacted area.”[3] The Plaintiff in Jensen challenges the residency requirement and two social equity qualifiers as discriminating against out of state applicants in violation of the Dormant Commerce Clause, and further challenges the “disproportionately impacted area” qualifier under the Equal Protection Clause.[4] The United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island had dismissed the Plaintiff’s claims based on ripeness.
In its November opinion, the First Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal and remanded for prompt consideration of the merits and any remedies on Jensen’s claims, instructing the district court to issue rulings at least 45 days before the Commission intends to issue retail licenses.[5] The Court rejected the Defendant’s arguments related to standing, ripeness, and mootness.[6] Signaling that the Court may have concerns regarding the constitutionality of the statute, the Court emphasized that the District Court’s error delayed adjudication of serious constitutional challenges, referencing both First Circuit and Second Circuit authority invalidating similar residency-based cannabis licensing restrictions in other states.[7]
The First Circuit’s decision clears the way for an expedited merits adjudication of the Plaintiff’s constitutional attack on Rhode Island’s residency and social equity eligibility provisions. The District Court must now decide the constitutionality of these provisions and any appropriate declaratory and injunctive relief on a timeline that ensures rulings issue at least 45 days before the Commission awards retail licenses. Stakeholders—regulators, applicants, and industry participants—should monitor this proceeding, as it not only has the potential to delay the application process that is already underway, but also could reshape access to Rhode Island’s retail cannabis licenses.
[1] Jensen v. Rhode Island Cannabis Control Comm.,No. 25-1132, — F.4th — , 2025 WL 3280840 (1st Cir., Nov. 25, 2025)
[2] See R.I. Gen. Laws § 21-28.11-1, et seq.
[3] Jensen, 2025 WL 3280840, at *2.
[4] Id. at *3.
[5] Id. at *1.
[6] Id. at *4-*7.
[7] Id. at *1.
About The Author
Leslie D. Parker
Leslie focuses her practice on commercial litigation and health care law. Leslie’s litigation practice encompasses a wide array of matters that include health care litigation, contractual claims, business torts, employment discrimination, banking laws, fraud, and administrative law.
